More cogent thoughts on the virtual meltdown over Wave’s discriminatory post yesterday.
Ms. Wave posts a couple of questions.Going by how she treats them, I suppose she thinks these are mere rhethoric questions no one needs answer. I beg to differ, Ms. Wave. Unlike you I believe these questions do need answers from an author who certainly won’t warn of bi/het content.
…and in any event, the M/M genre is supposed to be for romances between gay men, unless things have changed while I wasn’t looking.
No, the inference that gay men in a romance never have sex with women (or trans*men) is not my definition of things.
It starts with that I object to “m/m = 2 gay men”.
No. Absolutely not. If you want that, you need to visit the LGBT shelves and look for “gay romance”. That’s something else entirely, and I am very sorry to say, but you are far, far more likely to meet girls’…
View original post 1,133 more words